Hi Val, this discussion re: 1 x 1 = 2 is current debate on the internet. The idea of talking about it and reviewing the pulse around it is critical to seeing where it applies and why 1+2=3 is classical mathematics but we have entered a stage in computation where the old ways of thinking about linear and scalar issues needs a new model. I hope that helps. I think I caught on to your humour, but again, it is not all serious here. Eventually the test of mathematical wit will be who builds the best gpt. This is why the topic is important. Stick around for the ride
Hi Val, this discussion re: 1 x 1 = 2 is current debate on the internet. The idea of talking about it and reviewing the pulse around it is critical to seeing where it applies and why 1+2=3 is classical mathematics but we have entered a stage in computation where the old ways of thinking about linear and scalar issues needs a new model. I hope that helps. I think I caught on to your humour, but again, it is not all serious here. Eventually the test of mathematical wit will be who builds the best gpt. This is why the topic is important. Stick around for the ride
Have you ever heard of the concept that 1+2=3?